That blogger has now been revealed as Paul Brookes, a scientist at the University of Rochester med center. His anonymity was broken when a very angry individual spammed a large number of relevant researchers with an email claiming the Brookes was responsible for that page, which the angry person (pseudonymous, ironically), claimed was a hate site. Brookes has come under serious legal threats; at issue is whether some of the posts were libelous, since they often went well beyond pointing out suspicious figures and directly accused people, in public and to their institutions and grant agencies, of deliberate research misconduct.
There are several lessons to draw from all this, as has been pointed out both by Brookes (in a post that he took down) and others.
- There is a very serious problem with image manipulation out there in that community. It involves investigators and labs at some major places (as well as minor ones).
- Anecdotally, it looks like some journal editors in this field are reluctant to look at this issue as closely as it needs.
- Science-fraud.org did identify serious problems with a number of papers and prompted ORI investigations that uncovered research misconduct.
- There does seem to be a communal need for a better means of identifying suspicious papers, and blogs could serve this role. I'm reluctant to take page views as a direct measure of that need, though - a lot of people click on articles about Kim Kardashian's pregnancy and the latest celebrity trainwrecks, but that doesn't mean that there is a need for those articles.
- There really is no such thing as online anonymity. That's why I've never bothered to obscure my identity.
- Do not post anything online or email anything that you would be ashamed to see on the front page of the New York Times.
- Publicly accusing people of fraud is a serious business - it's not something that should be done without a lot of consideration of the consequences. The university's lawyers are also unlikely to protect a faculty member who makes public accusations like that without consulting them first.
- It does make me wonder whether there are similar issues in the physical sciences on this scale.
All in all, a rather depressing roundup. Remember, it's this kind of fraud and poor behavior that just give ammunition to the anti-science parts of society.