Monday, May 31, 2010

Demagnetization cooling

I've been meaning for some time to write a post about demagnetization cooling, a technique that is readily explained in an undergrad stat mech class, but has to be seen to be believed.  I was finally inspired to write this post by seeing this preprint.  Here's the basic idea.  Start with an ensemble of magnetic moments in what we will call a "demag stage".  The sample of interest will be thermally connected to this demag stage.  When I worked on this stuff in grad school, we used the nuclear magnetic moments of copper nuclei, but it's also possible to use electron magnetic moments in a paramagnetic salt of some kind.  Anyway, apply a large magnetic field to these magnetic moments (spins) while attached to a refrigeration source of some kind. It's energetically favorable for the moments to align with the applied field. When they flip to align, the energy that is released is carried away by the refrigerator.  Likewise, in the case of a metal like copper, the ramping up of the magnetic field can generate heat via eddy currents; that heat is also carried away by the refrigerator.  Now, once the spins are basically aligned, unhook the thermal connection between the demag stage and the refrigerator, and gently lower the applied magnetic field.  What happens?

First, the formalistic explanation.  Basic statistical physics tells us that the entropy of an ensemble of magnetic moments like those in our demag stage is only a function of the ratio B/T, where B is the applied magnetic field and T is the temperature of the moments.  If we are gentle in how we lower B, so that the entropy remains constant, that implies that lowering B by a factor of two also lowers T by a factor of two.  When I first did this as a grad student, it seemed like magic.  We thermally isolated the demag stage (plus sample), and I used an ancient HP calculator to tell a power supply to ramp down the current in a superconducting magnet.  Voila - like magic, the temperature (as inferred via the capacitance of a special pressure transducer looking at a mixture of liquid and solid 3He) dropped like a stone, linear in B.  Amazing, and no moving parts!  

So, physically, what's really going on, and what are the limitations?  Well, the right way to think about the ensemble of magnetic moments is as an entropic "sink" of energy.  Equilibrium statistical physics is based on the idea that all microscopic states of a system that have the same total energy are equally likely.  When you create an ensemble of 1023 magnetic moments all pointed in the same direction (that is, with an aligned population much greater than what one would expect in equilibrium based on the new value of B), the most likely place for thermal energy in your system to go is into flipping those spins, to try and bring the aligned population down and back into the new equilibrium.  That means that heat will flow out of your sample and out of, e.g., the lattice vibrations of the demag stage, and into flipping those spins.  The fortuitous thing is that for reasonable numbers of moments (based on volumes of material) and accessible initial values of B and T, you can get lots of cooling.  This is the way to cool kilogram quantities of copper down to tens of microKelvin, starting from a few milliKelvin.  It's a way to cool a magnetic salt (and attached sample) down from 4.2 K to below 100 mK, with no messy dilution refrigerator, and people sell such gadgets.  

There are practical limitations to this, of course.  For example, there is no point in reducing the external B below the value of the effective internal magnetic field due to spin-spin interactions or impurities.  Also, when demag-ed, the system is a closed box with a finite (though initially large) heat capacity.  Any measurement done on an attached sample will dump some heat into the stage, even if only through stray heat leaks from the rest of the world, limiting the amount of time the stage and sample remain cold before needing another demag cycle.  Finally, and most relevant to the preprint linked above, there are real issues with establishing thermal equilibrium.  For example, it is not hard to get the nuclei of copper to have a much lower effective temperature than the conduction electrons, with an effective equilibration time longer than the demag-ed spin system can be kept cold.  In other words, while the nuclei can get very cold for a while, the electrons are never able to reach similar temperatures.  Still, the whole concept of cooling through demagnetization is very interesting, and really brought home to me that all the abstract concepts I'd learned about entropy and spins had real consequences.   


corcoted said...

Demag cooling has also recently been demonstrated in ultracold atomic gases by the Ketterle group at MIT. They have an paper from last year on using spins for thermometry (Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 245301 (2009)), but they've now inverted the technique to perform cooling (presented at last week's APS DAMOP conference, but not yet published to my knowledge). One interesting contrast to solid state demag cooling is that the MIT group uses a magnetic field gradient, rather than a uniform field. This causes the spins to separate in space, allowing them to be imaged.

The problem of thermal equilibration that you mentioned is a hot topic in the AMO community right now (pun intended). Several experiments (e.g. DeMarco at Illinois, Chen at Chicago, Hulet at Rice) are demonstrating slow thermal relaxation times, which are frustrating efforts to get to low temperatures and to measure equilibrium ground states. Others (such as Weiss at Penn State) are investigating conditions that might make thermodynamic equilibrium difficult or impossible (i.e. is there a quantum version of the KAM theorem from chaos theory?).

It's all another great example of the cond-mat and AMO worlds merging.

Doug Natelson said...

Very interesting and informative - thanks! Still, this seems very tricky. Aren't the same magnetic degrees of freedom being used in demag connected with tuning other parameters, including the trapping interaction and the on-site repulsion in the optical lattice? Is cooling those (nuclear) magnetic degrees of freedom enough to cool the kinetic degrees of freedom of the atoms, which is what people really want to do?

Joel Kelly said...

Great post! I did a presentation on electrocaloric cooling, the ferroelectric equivalent of magnetic cooling and have been fascinated by refrigeration ever since.

In that field the big materials are organic polymers, which are cheap cheap cheap to make and operate and so people want to integrate them into commercial consumer cooling devices. The problem is that you can't generate a large electric field and the change in temperature isn't as good as the magnetocooling. Still might hold promise for on-chip, localized cooling that is very cheap and tough.

Anonymous said...

The University of Malaya invites qualified graduates to apply for the academic positions in the following fields

Faculty of Economics and Administration (Lecturer)

1. Demography
2. Macroeconomics
3. Land Economics
4. Environmental Management
5. Environmental and Resource Economics
6. Development Studies
7. Public Administration
8. Political Science
9. Multivariate Analysis
10.Time Series Analysis
11.Computer Information Systems

Center for Foundation Studies in Science (Lecturer)

1. Organic Chemistry
2. Physical Chemistry
3. Physics
4. Applied Mathematics
5. Computational Mathematics

Faculty of Science (Lecturer)

1. Chemistry
2. Physics
3. Material Science


Applicants must possess PhD or equivalent professional qualification in their respective field with at least 3 publications especially in internationally recognized scientific journals indexed in Web of Science. Applicants must also have good command and understanding of English.

Terms of Appointment & Application

Visit our homepage at for further details, then click "careers". We welcome you to submit your details through our online system by logging in to

Please submit your application to,

Principal Assistant Registrar,
Recruitment Unit,
Human Resource Division,
Level 1,
Chancellory Building,
University of Malaya,
50603 Kuala Lumpur

Tel : +603-7967 3208

Closing Date : 30 June 2010

Uncle Al said...

Copper has an averaged nuclear magnetic moment of +2.27 nuclear magnetons. Vanadium is 5.14 nuclear magnetons, with 1.25 as many nuclei/mass. Does vanadium win? What about niobium at 6.17 nuclear magnetons?

Anonymous said...

Demagnetization cooling was demonstrated already in an atomic gas in 2006:

Nature Physics 2, 765 - 768 (2006)

AC Service Phoenix said...

Azfireandice has been recognized for their quality of service. Whether you need to service or repair your current air conditioner or to purchase a new air conditioning unit, Ac Service Phoenix is one of the best service provider for you.