I've written before about the Einstein-deHaas effect - supposedly Einstein's only experimental result (see here, too) - a fantastic proof that spin really is angular momentum. In that experiment, a magnetic field is flipped, causing the magnetization of a ferromagnet to reorient itself to align with the new field direction. While Einstein and deHaas thought about amperean current loops (the idea that magnetization came from microscopic circulating currents that we would now call orbital magnetism), we now know that magnetization in many materials comes from the spin of the electrons. When those spins reorient, angular momentum has to be conserved somehow, so it is transferred to/from the lattice, resulting in a mechanical torque that can be measured.
Less well-known is the complement, the Barnett effect. Take a ferromagnetic material and rotate it. The mechanical rotational angular momentum gets transferred (via rather complicated physics, it turns out) at some rate to the spins of the electrons, causing the material to develop a magnetization along the rotational axis. This seems amazing to me now, knowing about spin. It must've really seemed nearly miraculous back in 1915 when it was measured by Barnett.
So, how did Barnett actually measure this, with the technology available in 1915? Here's the basic diagram of the scheme from the original paper:
There are two rods that can each be rotated about its long axis. The rods pass through counterwound coils, so that if there is a differential change in magnetic flux through the two coils, that generates a current that flows through the fluxmeter. The Grassot fluxmeter is a fancy galvanometer - basically a coil suspended on a torsion fiber between poles of a magnet. Current through that coil leads to a torque on the fiber, which is detected in this case by deflection of a beam of light bounced off a mirror mounted on the fiber. The paper describes the setup in great detail, and getting this to work clearly involved meticulous experimental technique and care. It's impressive how people were able to do this kind of work without all the modern electronics that we take for granted. Respect.