Some brief science and technology items heading into the weekend:
- IBM has reported making prototype chips for the "0.7 nm node". As always, one should not interpret that size scale literally, since the effective diameter of a single silicon atom is around 0.2 nm. The basic building block of their architecture here is the nanostack, which is a limiting case, somewhat 3D-integrated version of their nanosheet "gate all around" field effect transistors. The fact that these structures can be made at this scale, reliably and en masse, is just phenomenal.
- I'd written previously about the Vesuvius Challenge, the attempt to use a combination of x-ray tomographic imaging and machine learning to read the carbonized ancient Roman scrolls found in a villa in Herculaneum, where they had been buried by the pyroclastic flow from the eruption in 79CE. Well, they've managed to read a complete scroll - here's the preprint. Very cool, and the hope is that among those scrolls might be books believed lost to history.
- At the beginning of the month, Microsoft unveiled the next iteration of their approach to implementing topological qubits based on superconductor/semiconductor hybrid devices, as described here. The relevant preprint is this one. Some reporting on this is here. This week, Nature published a comment on the prior work as well as the reply.
- There has been an explosion of research in recent years about trying to use electromagnetic cavities to tune the physical properties of condensed matter systems. I'd discussed this here. In the last couple of weeks, this preprint appeared, reporting that placing few-layer NbSe2 in an appropriate (THz) cavity can increase the superconducting transition temperature from 3.02 K to 3.41 K. A 13% increase in \(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) is certainly interesting.
- The incoming president of the National Academy of Sciences has a nice statement in Science. The key passage for me: "By its charter, the Academy is nonpartisan and neither a progressive organization nor a conservative one. It is a scientific body that follows the evidence wherever it leads, even when the destination might be unwelcome. In heated and polarized discourse, it is the Academy’s obligation to be the most careful and trustworthy voice. But rigorous science that arrives too late, or speaks too quietly, serves no one."
No comments:
Post a Comment