Sorry - blogging has been slow in recent days because, despite it being summer, it's been a very busy time for various reasons.
Here are a couple of articles that I've come across that seem interesting. On the news/popular writing front:
- The Hubble Space Telescope isn't dead yet!
- TSMC is going to crank up fab capacity for the older generation (e.g. 28 nm node) chips that do important things like run our cars.
- Intel might be trying to buy GlobalFoundries (the fab arm spun off by AMD a while ago).
- A great article by Natalie Wolchover about progress in pure math circles regarding relative sizes of infinities.
- In this Nature paper, the google quantum AI team have used their 53 qubit chip to do proof-of-concept demonstrations of two different quantum error correction approaches. Perhaps someone more knowledgable that me can chime in below in the comments about how the ratio of physical qubits to logical qubits depends on the fidelity and other properties of the physical qubits. Basically, I'm wondering if, e.g., ion trap-based schemes would be able to make even better advantage out of the 1D error correction approach here.
- Meanwhile, in China a large group has demonstrated a 66 qubit system similar in design to the google/Martinis approach.
12 comments:
For the last two, perhaps worth pointing out that although you've given the correct number of functioning qubits on each chip, in the actual experiments both groups only use a subset of the total- presumably because of varying fabrication or error rates. The Google experiment uses up to 21 qubits in this paper, while the Chinese experiment uses up to 56 qubits.
The conclusions section of the paper says this:
However, practical quantum computation will require Λ ≈ 10 for a reasonable physical-to-logical qubit ratio of 1,000:1 .... Achieving Λ ≈ 10 will require substantial reductions in operational error rates and further research into mitigation of error mechanisms such as high-energy particles.
(Here Λ is a measure of the fidelity of individual qubits.)
So they are saying that if they can do things much better, it will require "only" 1000 physical qubits for each logical qubit to do reliably error-corrected computations. If they want to compute with 50 logical qubits, they will need 50,000 physical qubits, almost 1000 times the size of systems that have been demonstrated so far, and then only if they can reduce the baseline error rate significantly.
Nice work, but there is a long way for this strategy.
Another very interesting paper (to me) was done on superconducting qubits that showed the errors induced by cosmic rays are *correlated*, unlike the usual assumption in error correction that errors are independent and occur on the single qubit level.
Besides pointing out new and interesting hurdles for error correction, this type of correlated error detection could be a very novel detector of solid state correlation physics or novel high energy particle phenomena.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03557-5
@Don, yeah. So, my question is, what is \(\Lambda\) for, e.g., trapped ion qubits?
@Anon1, thanks - I should've pointed that out.
@Anon2, thanks for pointing out that paper. That's really neat (though a concern if it means that we really need to worry about cosmic rays as an error source in solid-state qubit implementations). It does make you think about quantum-enhanced sensing for particle detection - can the entanglement buy us enhanced sensitivity?
Contact information:
website: https://voyagewatch.com
telephone/whatsapp: +1 (937) 203-0970
Email: voyagewatcher@gmail.com
website: https://voyagewatch.com
website: https://voyagewatch.com
website: https://voyagewatch.com
Voyagewatch works in the issue and sales of 100% real and replica documents online. Real documents involve valid and certified documents that can be used officially and anywhere permitted by law with valid copies in corresponding database. Replicas on the other hand involve documents which are exact clones of real documents with no database information. Voyagewatch and its professional team works on documents from all over the world such as:
Real passports, ID cards, driver's license, visa, residence permits, bank statements, ssn online, undetectable counterfeit banknotes, birth certificates, marriage certificates, vehicle documents, utility bills, death certificates etc
Contact information:
telephone/whatsapp: +1 (937) 203-0970
Email: voyagewatcher@gmail.com
Key phrases
Apply and buy real documents online
Abuy real fake documents online
buy genuine documents online
buy passport online
buy us passport online
buy real passport online
passport buying online
passport online purchase
online passport purchase
fake passport online
buy real and fake passport online
buy fake uk passport online
buy fake us passport online
order fake passport online
buy fake passport online forum
buy fake passport online
buy fake uk passport online
buy fake us passport online
fake passport online order
Drivers license online authentic 1st orders
order fake & real driver's license online
order fake driver license online
buy real driving license online
buy fake drivers licence online
fake driver license online
real fake drivers license online
US driver license
Buy UK driver license
order real & fake ID online
buy id card online
order fake ID card online
certificate of nationality
Order UK ID card
Buy US ID card
for buy degree online the visit our website and place order for the degree you want .
Thank you for sharing this interesting information. I can also share with you the website of Insulin Store, the best insulin supplier from Canada. Here you can buy ozempic online. They sell only high-quality products, and the prices are much cheaper than in the US.
Buy Fake Driver License by just a click.
A driver's license is a government-issued document that allows individuals to operate a motor vehicle legally.
Adriver's license is a government-issued document that allows individuals to operate a motor vehicle legally.
Buying an italian driving licence is illegal and can result in severe penalties. Always acquire licenses through proper channels.
Post a Comment