Friday, February 05, 2010
The arxiv blog: a good idea gone awry?
When it first began, I was impressed with the arxivblog. The anonymous authors did a good and remarkably prompt job of surfing the preprint archive, and posting interesting tidbits, on essentially a daily basis. Moving to the Technology Review website seemed like it could only be a good thing. Larger readership, greater outreach to a scientifically literate audience, etc. Now I have to wonder. The arxivblog frequently seems to feature theory preprints that are rather far out (alternative theories of gravity; exotic quantum entanglement interpretational issues), and doesn't always make clear just how speculative some of these are. Moreover, it seems that many of the comments, particularly on these more speculative topics, are, umm, not informative. So, is the purpose of the arxivblog to showcase exciting new science (which is what the Technology Review usually does), or is it to be "gee whiz"/quantum sure is weird/nanobots-will-save-us-all entertainment?
Posted by Douglas Natelson at 1:26 PM