Continuing my series of posts trying to describe condensed matter topics in relatively non-technical language....
As I've mentioned before, in condensed matter physics, we tend to give particle-like names (that is, ones that end in "-on") to excitations of systems that have well-defined particle-like attributes, like momentum, energy, and angular momentum (such as spin). Plasmons are another example of this, and lately they've become extremely fashionable because it's increasingly clear that they can be technologically useful.
A plasmon is a collective excitation of the electronic "fluid" in a piece of conducting material, like ripples on the surface of a pond are a collective mode of the water molecules of the liquid. The simile here isn't too far off, because like water, the electronic fluid in a metal is pretty close to incompressible. If you push down on the surface of a pond somewhere with a float, the density of the water doesn't change; instead the water elsewhere is displaced, because the water molecules have finite volume and push each other out of the way. The electronic fluid acts similarly, not because of any finite size or even the Coulomb repulsion of the electrons, but mostly because of the Pauli exclusion principle, which tends to keep the electrons out of each others' way.
These electronic ripples can have a well-defined wavelength (which quantum mechanics tells us is related to their momentum). What makes them have a frequency? That is, what makes the plasmon waves wave? When the electrons are displaced, the positive charge left behind exerts an attractive force on the electrons, trying to pull them back to their original positions. This interaction is what makes the plasmons oscillate once they're excited, and these Coulomb interactions are also why plasmons cost energy to excite. These Coulomb interactions with the positive background charge also force plasmons to obey certain boundary conditions at the edges of the host metal. As a result, nanoparticles can have discrete allowed plasmonic modes strongly influenced by particle shape, while larger structures (e.g., thin metal films) can have propagating plasmon modes over a broad range of wavelengths. Typical plasmon frequencies are comparable to the frequencies of visible light (i.e., ~ 1015 Hz). Plasmons decay (into incoherent electron-hole pair excitations), eventually dissipating their energy as the sloshing electrons scatter instead of oscillating smoothly, and as oscillating electric dipoles (and other multipoles) radiate.
Plasmons have gotten so much attention lately for several reasons. They may offer a way of shuttling information around on computer chips that naturally interfaces with optics. Plasmons are also associated with large local electric fields at metal surfaces, which can be very useful for certain kinds of spectroscopies and things like optical trapping. Finally, in properly designed materials, plasmon properties can be manipulated so that the overall optical response of a conducting system can be tuned, leading to lots of hope and hype about "perfect lenses" and "invisibility cloaks".
thanks! This post made a whole lot of things a whole lot more clear.
ReplyDelete... maybe you should consider putting all of these posts into a print-on-demand book, available from someone like LuLu?
Very nicely explained, I've been struggling with how to understand and explain the surface plasmon interactions with my silver nanoparticles and this helped.
ReplyDeleteToo good !
ReplyDeleteThanks a ton.
-Student,India
A simple but crisp explanation. Best suited for ones who would wanna get a basic grip on how plasmon interactions occur. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteThe concept is an interesting one, with several important potential applications, John Pendry, a physicist at Imperial College in London in the UK, told the publication. It could find uses in stealth technology and camouflage.
ReplyDeletevery nicely explained. It gave me a lots of help regarding my presentation on surface plasmon resonance..
ReplyDeletePakistan
Thanks this helps
ReplyDeleteThis is amazing. You completely saved one of my recent lab reports, thank you so much!
ReplyDeleteDan Jenkinson, Australia
Is it possible to create large plasmon-like surface waves on spherically curved cavities accompanied by radial evanescent modes?
ReplyDeletevery nice and easy explanation of plasmon.really impressed......
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteVery clear explanation! thank you so much. This article helps me to understand how a plasmon is produced (far away clearly than wikipedia and other web articles)
ReplyDeleteMaster Student, Mexico
Very helpful thank you
ReplyDeleteThat's very sweet synopsis, Nice explanation, sir, thanks a lot..
ReplyDeleteThank you for your very clear and down-to-Earth explanation. Your type of description have become increasingly rare on Internet, and I appreciated it very much.
ReplyDeleteAnthony M.
Where can I find a more technical explanation?
ReplyDeleteThanks for this amazing explanation. I would love to see an explanation of surface plasmon resonance too. And it will be really helpful if you can explain plasmon scattering (or even phonon scattering) in more detail.
ReplyDeleteI also have a question,
How can we assume that plasmon (also phonon) obeys QM, such that we can define their momentum just by well defined wave vector?
I came across your blog while trying to figure out what a plasmon is. Wow! What a clear & helpful explanation. Now, I'm addicted to reading all of your posts, & I can't wait to get your book! So, both thank you AND darn you! As if I didn't have enough to read already.
ReplyDeleteRespectfully, Anonymous Fan from New Orleans, La.
Simply but clear explanation. Thank you!
ReplyDelete-Solid States Msc by course student. University of Science, Malaysia
When I read your article on this topic, the first thought seems profound and difficult. There is also a bulletin board for discussion of articles and photos similar to this topic on my site, but I would like to visit once when I have time to discuss this topic. 메이저사이트
ReplyDelete